Cross-Functional Range
Experience across customer, candidate, member, partner, and participant audiences creates pattern recognition that a single-channel specialist may not have.
About
The same question kept coming up in different rooms. Who has to move, and what will actually move them?
In marketing it looked like an audience that was not responding. In recruitment it looked like a pipeline that would not fill. In sales it looked like activity that never turned into anything predictable. In programs, partnerships, and community it looked like people who were invited and did not show up.
Those look like different problems. They are usually the same one. Somewhere between the organization and the people it needs, the path is unclear. No amount of extra activity fixes an unclear path.
That is what ETL Collective is for. Making the path specific. Who matters, what they care about, what should get built, and how to keep doing it once it works.
I have spent my career across marketing, recruitment, sales, partnerships, programs, and community building. That range is the point. It is where the pattern came from, and it is why the method holds whether the audience is a customer, a candidate, or a member.
I am Mati Fombang, an audience growth strategist and the founder of ETL Collective. The lens I work through is audience architecture. Start with who has to move, then build everything else around them.
What Makes the Work Different
Experience across customer, candidate, member, partner, and participant audiences creates pattern recognition that a single-channel specialist may not have.
Comfortable diagnosing the problem, building the plan, launching the work, learning from response, and adjusting.
Starts with who must move and why before defaulting to channels, content, or campaigns.
Looks beyond the first win to measurement, process, ownership, and what the organization can keep doing.
How ETL Works With Leaders
Most growth plans fail after the analysis is done. They land on someone who cannot act on them. No clear decision, no internal agreement, no owner after the kickoff.
What is actually being chosen, what is being set aside, and what the trade-off costs.
Reasoning built to hold up with a board, an executive team, or a client. Not only in the room where it was made.
Who runs it, what they measure, and what happens when the first version needs changing.
For a founder that can mean getting clear enough to show up and commit to a lane. For a functional leader inside a larger organization it usually means being able to defend the plan upward and hand it to a team. Same work, different room.
Tell us what you are trying to grow and where it is stuck. You will get a personal reply.
Start a Conversation